Month: March 2016

Despite my own personal experience otherwise, it seems as if we’re seeing a bit of a boom in Shakespeare books.  There’s LOL Shakespeare, Star Wars Shakespeare, Lego Shakespeare … you name it. Every time I see a new one (assuming it’s any good), I bang my head against the wall for a little while wondering why I didn’t think of that first.

Not all of the best ones will show up on the shelf of your local Barnes and Noble, however. For the smaller independent efforts we must turn to Kickstarter, where this week we find Death by Shakespeare.

My first thought was, “Hey, this looks a lot like the Deaths in Shakespeare infographic (by friend of the blog Caitlin S. Griffin).” But is that a bad thing? That’s the joy of public domain, that two different people can take the same source material and go in two different creative directions. I don’t really have the space or the decor to put up a poster, but there’s always room on my bookshelf or coffee table for a nicely illustrated hardcover.

The authors are close to their goal, which is a good thing, but sometimes it’s all about the stretch goals. They’ve got plenty of rewards and add-ons for you to customize exactly what you want. Check out the “Thou Getst Art” rewards, where you can get a special individual print of your favorite character’s demise. Joan of Arc? Bardolph? Adonis?  Looks like they didn’t just stick to the classics we read in high school.

If you want to help support more such independent Shakespeare publishing projects, go check it out! 

(Spotted this on a Reddit “Shower Thought” the other day and I liked it.)

Keep searching “Shakespeare” over the years and you’re going to run up against the “Infinite Monkey Theorem” again and again and again.  If you’re not familiar, it’s the philosophical idea that if you sit enough monkeys behind enough typewriters for enough time, eventually one of them will bang out the complete works of Shakespeare.

In 2003 somebody who clearly does not understand infinite number theory actually managed to get grant money to give real typewriters to real monkeys and see what happens. As you could probably imagine, the most interesting results to come out of that experiment were that they held down the S key, and then generally smashed the computer with rocks before peeing on it.

Somebody even simulated the idea in source code. He claims to have proven it, but his interpretation does not solve the same problem.  The theory suggests that eventually a single random string of characters would be generated that matches Shakespeare’s complete works. What he did was to keep looking at substrings, and when he found a match, he’d cross it off and consider it “found”, until all substrings were found. A neat project, no doubt, and a cool bit of code – but not the same thing.

That project was inspired by this Simpsons reference that shows just how pervasive this idea has become:

Anyway, back to the shower thought.  Try this on for size:

The theory has already been proven once. It’s took 4 billion years, I don’t know how many billions of evolving “monkeys” and countless technological advancement in “typewriters”, but the system (known by its other name, “life on Earth”) did, eventually, produce William Shakespeare and his complete works.

Mind blown.  Aren’t we just evolved monkeys?

Who knows. Maybe it’s obvious, maybe it’s a restatement of the premise with no semantic content.  I’d never heard it, and it’s an interesting new way to look at something I’ve seen hundreds of times already. Reminds me a bit of Hitchhiker’s Guide To The Galaxy (which also has its own infinite monkey reference, if you remember ;))