Hamlet’s Hit Points

I’m not quite sure what to do with this offering from a site called Game Playwright, which in itself seems highly cool to me:

In these pages, you’ll find definitions of nine critical story beats. You’ll read about the relationships between those beats. You’ll also find complete analyses of three stories you know already—Hamlet, Casablanca, and Dr. No—to show you how the system works.

Written with roleplayers in mind, Hamlet’s Hit Points is an indispensable tool for understanding stories, in games and everywhere else.

I’ve often brainstormed on the ideas of using Shakespeare’s characters as fodder for computer games of various sorts, so this fascinates me.  In my version, computer AI has developed to a high enough degree that you could essentially “seed” your Hamlets and Ophelias and watch the play (the plot, at least) run through on its own sort of auto pilot.  Then insert the player character and watch to see how he can disrupt the proceedings. This book looks like it’s geared toward game designers, but it seems like the sort of thing any random Shakespeare geek might be fascinated by.   [ Spotted via Steve’s Gamer Blog ]

We live for our dreams.

Status : Unsolved

Took me a little while to find this one, which scrolled by on Twitter.  It’s not Shakespeare (at least, not in that form), but I’m trying to figure out a valid source.

Here’s a pointer to Henry James, circa 1864.  That doesn’t mean he was first to use the expression, though.

The full quote, as James uses it:

We live for our dreams – but meanwhile, we live by our wits.

Love is all we have, the only way that each can help the other

Status: Not by Shakespeare

Saw this go by on Twitter just now, but it’s an easy find.  All Googling shows it as originating with Euripides.  Specifically, and I’m quoting Wikipedia here so take this for what you will:

The quote "Love is all we have, the only way that each can help the other" is listed under William Arrowsmith’s translation of Orestes, but I read that and another translation and found nothing like it. Does anyone know if the quote is credible and, if so, what its source is?

It appears to be from line 298 in at least one publication of the Arrowsmith translation.

The line 298 link above points to the books.google.com confirmation.

 

New friends may be poems but old friends are alphabets. Do not forget alphabets, because you will need them to read the poems.

Status: Not by Shakespeare

This is another one of those quotes that seems to have come up someplace and wandered around a bit until someone put “Shakespeare once said…” in front of it and it stuck.  I can find nothing even close to this quote in Shakespeare’s works (hint, Shakespeare only ever used the word “alphabet” once, in Titus Andronicus),  nor did I particularly expect to.  It sounds more like something off a Hallmark card.

Still searching for an original source, but hopes are not high.  A quote this long is typically written many different ways, which makes Googling for a true original difficult.