There are many “questions” about Shakespeare’s life and work. There’s of course the big Authorship question, but also a whole bunch about his married life, that other woman, whether he was even heterosexual, who was Mr. W.H.…and then there’s questions within the work itself: was Hamlet mad? Did Gertrude know? Sullied or solid? 🙂 Some questions annoy people, and we take the position that it’s not really a question at all. Others, though, tend to merit lively discussion. Which are your favorite questions? You’re at a party and you hear people discussing Shakespeare – which topic do you studiously avoid, and which do you jump in with an “Excuse me, I couldn’t help overhearing…” As is probably obvious to my regular readers, I’m always interested in questions about the work more than the man. While it’s interesting to me (mostly as a married man) whether Shakespeare was happily married or shotgunned into it, I just don’t think we’ll ever know. For the record, I realize that “questions about the work” could be considered simply “preference of interpretation” and thus there is no right answer. What I’m talking about is Shakespeare’s original intent. If we went back in time 400 years and watched these plays performed (assuming we could understand a bloody word of it!) would we see someone playing Hamlet as mad, or just putting on an antic disposition?
Meet The Commenters
I haven’t done one of these in awhile. It seems like a good a time as any, seeing the lovefest going on over in the recent threads on iambic pentameter in the sonnets, and the “man v. work” debate. Who are you, and what’s Shakespeare to you? Author, actor, director, teacher? Just random lover of the Bard? Here’s your chance to introduce yourself to our readers. After all, you folks are often the ones coming up with the really good content, I just open up the threads. Seems only fitting that everybody get introduced. Plugging stuff (i.e. links) are welcome, do not feel like you’re being spammy. My one rule : I expect an actual human written introduction that explains the link and preferably a little bit about yourself. If I catch any spambots spotting this opportunity to just drop in random anonymous links, then those I will kill. And yes if you’ve introduced yourself before feel free to do it again, I get new readers all the time. 🙂
Reminder, FREE Books!
Just reminding folks that Marie over at Sourcebooks Shakespeare was kind enough to donate *2* book+CD packages for me to giveaway here on Shakespeare Geek. Read my reviews here and here. I’ll hit the highlights: Focused primarily on Shakespeare in performance, these books provide a very well formatted and edited version of each play, accompanied by liberal notes including not just the standard glossary, but editorial comments about why certain decisions were made, anecdotes about famous interpretations of the scene in question, and screen shots from movies and stage of famous portrayals. And then there’s the accompanying audio, “hyperlinked” (as best you can in a paper book!) to tracks on the accompanying audio CD. So when you get to the heath, you get to hear for yourself a few different versions of how it has been interpreted. Of course, that’s the King Lear example – Marie’s actually offered to let my winners pick which play they want from the Sourcebooks catalog, which includes most of the major works. Quick reminder of the rules! 1) Follow @ShakespeareGeek on Twitter. I’ll need to be able to message you in case you win. In case it wasn’t obvious, you have to be willing to provide a mailing address so we can actually send the book. 2) As the saying goes, "retweet” this specific link, swapping in the name of the book you’d prefer if you win. You don’t have to call it “my favorite play” or anything, I just need to keep track of who is voting for which books. Please use the link I’ve provided, do not just link to the main blog post, it may not be picked up by my filters. 3) That’s it! I’ll keep track of contest entries and then choose 2 randomly from those received by midnight (EST), April 22. That meaning the midnight at the close of 4/22, before 4/23, lest there be any confusion. 4) Winners will be notified by Twitter direct message (DM) so please make sure you keep that channel open and check it regularly, at least until contest winners are announced on the blog. PLEASE DO NOT FORGET STEP TWO! I get new Twitter followers every day, and I have no idea which of them want to be entered into the contest unless they follow it up with the request retweet. You do not want me to just enter every new followed into the contest, that will drastically cut down the chances of winning for people who do actually want the books, so please RT the message so I can keep track. Thanks!!
Hey Vern! To Be Or Not To Be, Am I Right?
Sourcebooks Review Part II : The Audio
When I first reviewed Sourcebooks Shakespeare I had not ripped into the accompanying audio CD because I wanted to give them away to my readers. Well, now that we are giving away copies to TWO readers I am free to dig in. Umm…wow. Or maybe, holy cow! Or fill in your own word for “cow”. To think I almost missed this. Let me take a moment to explain how I listen to stuff on CD these days. Regardless of the matter, I rip it into MP3, compile it all up into a single file, turn it into audiobook format, and then put it on my ipod where I most typically listen while driving. I got into this habit specifically because the ipod lets you put audiobooks (and not just any random MP3) on “faster” mode, allowing you to effectively speed read your way through a book on CD. It was with this approach that I began the King Lear CD. …and it took me about 10 seconds to turn off “faster” mode, for starters. I want to enjoy this, not merely say that I completed it. The CD ends up being something that is half lesson, half sampler, and all wonderful. There’s a very simple structure – Derek Jacobi narrates, introducing a scene from the play followed by two different versions of that same scene. At least I think it is always two, I’m not quite done yet. By description I don’t just mean he says “Ok, here’s the Scofield versus the Olivier” – that would be the sampler. It is a lesson because he explains what to listen for in each, how in the first you might hear Edgar doing a manic Poor Tom who barely prevents breaking character when he realizes he is speaking to the king, while in the second you get an Edgar who always looks to be in control of himself and is merely spouting a steady stream of gibberish. (That is my paraphrase, that is not part of the narration). I could listen to that all day. There is no confusion, none at all, with this snipping of a scene here and a scene there, without context. The narration provides perfect context, telling you what’s led up to this point, and walking you through the action that will happen. It is where he says what to listen for that the real hardcore fans in the audience might find fault, as they’d like to listen for themselves first. Not me. I’m perfectly happy to be told the differences to watch for, and then see if I can hear it in the performance. Quite honestly sometimes I agree, sometimes I don’t. Jacobi may tell me that this Lear is going to speak to the storm like it’s a person standing next to him, but then when I hear that performance that’s not the thought I get at all. Walking through the scenes like this is also a great way to get a taste of productions you might not otherwise get to witness. The first Fool I ever saw was John Hurt, playing to Olivier’s Lear. Samples from that version are included, sometimes up against none other than Kenneth Branagh, playing the Fool vs Paul Scofield’s Lear. You know what? To my ear, Branagh never stood a chance. 🙂 It is easy to get confused, I have to say that. One long stream of various people doing various scenes from the play makes it hard to connect the two and say “Ok, I remember how Olivier played Lear in the first scene, now I want to compare it to the scene on the heath…” That might be easier with the original CD and the book for reference, rather than how I am doing it. [Funny aside, a coworker just came by as we wrap up our lunch hour and we got into a discussion about source material and multiple versions, and how there are some folks that will only ever love the first “version” they see, while others will seek out multiple versions and find their enjoyment in the intricate differences between the two. I played a sample of this very audio for her, explaining that even though it is an analysis of King Lear, “This is the sort of thing I listen to for fun.” You know what? It sounds 1000x better on my headphones than in the car, I may have to switch my listening style…] Anyway, wrapping it up. This is just wonderful, wonderful stuff. I’d like the entire canon like this, please. I want more than 2 examples of each, I want half a dozen. I want a web site where they’re all indexed so I can pick and choose, a virtual Build-a-Lear Workshop (I just thought of that! :)) where I can piece together some Olivier, some Scofield, some McKellen… Don’t forget, we’re giving away two copies, so what are you waiting for?