Ok, I said I’d get my act together, and I didn’t lie.  The winner of the Manga Shakespeare edition of A Midsummer Night’s Dream is… Bill, from Shakespeare Teacher! Congratulations, Bill!  Get in touch with a mailing address and I’ll send the book right along. Thanks for playing everybody (and to those who didn’t even realize they were playing :)).  I’ve got a good game in mind for the next giveaway, I just have to get back in touch with the publisher and get some giveaways :).

Hi Everybody,

I haven’t forgotten about the Manga Shakespeare contest, just finding myself very busy now that my old schedule has gone completely out the window with the loss of my job. You have no idea what it does to a geek like myself (and in this case I mean geek in the computer sense) when you take away the machine that he’d carried around with him daily for the last 2 years. I can’t yet comfortably sit in my office and do things the way I used to sit on the couch and churn stuff out.

But fear not, I should have something up by the end of today. Stay tuned! Thanks for everybody that played, I hope everybody that’s left a comment knows they just got entered into the contest 🙂

Ok, I know there are folks out of there who are mad crazy fans of the move 10 Things I Hate About You, either for the Shakespeare or the Heath Ledger, I’m not sure which.

You folks will be happy to learn that ABC Family is going to attempt a series out of it. Of course, it won’t have Shakespeare (if he didn’t write a sequel to Shrew, what can ya do?) and it won’t have Heath Ledger.

So I was thinking the other day what Shakespeare might have to say on the subject of unemployment. Then I thought it would be funny to break out my copy of Filthy Shakespeare, since when you are unemployed you do tend to swear. A lot. 🙂

Wow, what a horrible book this is. I mean, it’s offensively bad. I have "Bawdy Shakespeare", the classic reference on Shakespeare’s more colorful language. The problem with that one is that, having been written over half a century ago, it goes to great lengths to cover up its own subject matter. Students today looking up the dirty Shakespeare words would probably also have to start by looking up words like "pudenda."

No such problem with Filthy Shakespeare, where even the chapter titles are so profane I wouldn’t let my mother anywhere near them. Forget about f-words, there’s a couple of good variations of c-words in there as well. I’m not kidding, there is a chapter entitled "Pertaining To …. " well, country matters. You know?

My problem is not so much with the language, but with the childish way it ends up presented. For instance, did you know that the word "all" could also be a reference to male or female genitals? Now, take that knowledge and go to any passage in Shakespeare that uses the word, and replace it with the swear word of your choice (I’m trying very hard not to just go for broke and use the same language this book uses). Because, as everybody knows, if a word could mean something else in one context, then OF COURSE Shakespeare meant it that way EVERY TIME HE USED IT.

As I write this review I keep flipping randomly through the book, hoping to find something good to say and only coming up with more examples of why I hate it. Want a good one? Try this out at a cocktail party (gasp! I said cocktail!! I must have meant buggery party!!!): “Hey everybody, did you know that Shakespeare’s name really is slang for wanker? Get it? Shake your spear? Hahaha, isn’t that a riot? No? Anyway…”)

The format of each chapter is simple : Eye-catching obscene title (“One Prick Too Many” is about the tamest one I can find), chapter summary where the author tells us what sorts of words we can hope to find, and in what scene of what play, and then some normal text that attempts to actually be grown up talk. Then the scene, and then a word-for-word translation of the scene with all the dirty words swapped in, which ends up for the most part making no sense at all. Oh, and then a glossary that breaks down every word, just in case you missed it the first 10 times. Each chapter is like it’s own little Freudian lesson – if it’s longer than it is wide, it’s a phallic reference, and if it’s round (or soft or indented or apparently fruity or birdlike) it’s a female reference.

Methinks somebody needs to tell the author that sometimes a rapier is just a rapier. I’m left thinking that this book is some sort of joke to be passed among Shakespeareans so we can all chuckle and say “Oh Pauline, you tramp! Oh no you didn’t!” and then move on.

Ok, everybody, let’s do this. I’ve had a copy of Manga Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream sitting on my shelf for weeks, waiting to give it away. I keep saying I’ll review it first, but honestly I just don’t have the time these days, so you’ll have to take my word for it or do you own research. I expect that if you’re at all into “manga” then you know exactly what to expect.

Here’s the rules:

* Between now and let’s say end of day Saturday, November 22, leave a comment on a Shakespeare Geek blog post.

* It cannot be this one. It has to be something with actual “talking about Shakespeare stuff” content.

* Say something more valuable than “Please include me in the contest!” Trust me, I’ll see you. I have alerts on all the site comments.

* Early next week I will randomly select from all the comments received, and post the winner. I’ll need to get in touch with you if you win so I can get your mailing address, so please stay in touch if you’re not a regular visitor! Come back and look for the results post.

Ok. Any questions? Get to commenting.