Are you familiar with the service IFTTT, short for “If This Then That”? I’ve been using it for years to automate large parts of my online life. You understand how the concept of a “push notification” works on your phone, right? Some event happens, and you are alerted to that fact. Maybe the football game is over and you want to know the score. Maybe you got a text from a person on a particular favorites list.
What IFTTT does is extracts that out to a web service so it’s not limited to your phone, and the possibilities are endless. You can say things like “When the weather service says it’s going to rain tomorrow, text me to remember my umbrella” or “Every time I connect or disconnect from the car bluetooth, add a row to a Google spreadsheet” (so I can track my commute times).
Where’s the Shakespeare, you ask? I’m getting to that part.
If you’re going to refer to Shakespeare in the clue, it’s only reasonable to expect that the answer will be something Shakespeare-specific. I feel cheated.
Coworker: “Shakespeare was clue in my crossword this morning.”
I love a good Shakespeare crossword clue. I love it when Shakespeare is the Jeopardy category. It’s a chance to test my knowledge on the fly. I love the ones that I don’t know the answer to, because it means I get to go seek out and learn something new about my favorite subject. In this case, though, I thought I could predict the future.
The New York Times put this clue in a puzzle once and put this blog on the map. I woke up one morning to see that literally tens of thousands of people had hit my site. It was just a coincidence that I had a page up titled “Romeo’s Last Words,” and google had caught it. So when thousands of NY Times crossword solvers suddenly searched “Romeo’s last words”, there I was. It comes back around again every few years, too. I can tell by the spike my traffic.
Oh, well. But like I said, I like when I don’t know the answer, I get to make more guesses. I had a sudden epiphany. I thought I for sure had this one.
Me: “Wyrd.”
Coworker: “Nope.”
Drat. I admitted I was stumped. What else could you say that was specific to Macbeth’s witches in only four letters? Toil? Fire? Burn? Rain?
Coworker: “They wanted ‘trio’.”
Me: “Well that’s just … that’s annoying. There’s nothing Shakespeare about that answer.”
Coworker: “I know, but sometimes they’re like that. Don’t feel bad, I had the t and the o and I still didn’t get it.”
Michael Fassbender’s Macbeth obviously threw me off because that one had four witches. 🙂
It got started when I realised you could change a lamp post into a public swingball, and then that you could make that into a rhythmic game about iambic pentameter, and we could get people to say the text in public, if they were playing swingball.
That’s Anton Hecht, creator of the game. Sorry, “community-based game and public art experience.” When I saw the Reddit video I thought it was more about the challenge of having memorized a particular sonnet and having to recall it. But as the article shows, the words and meter are actually written down and posted on the pole so you can read at the same time (which definitely implies that somebody has to start with some knowledge of the subject!). It’s more about saying it out loud, and we all know the importance of that. Every time somebody asks about memorizing Shakespeare the first bit of advice that comes up is, “Say it out loud.”
I have to admit I kind of love the idea of randomly walking down the street and hearing people reciting Shakespeare while playing a game. What was it Caliban told us? Be not afeard, the isle is full of noises, sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not. Who’s to say that doesn’t apply equally to just walking down the street and taking in the ambient sounds around you?
I’m kind of wondering if Mr. Hecht is googling for references and might stop by. I don’t know that I’ve seen swingball very much in the US and I’m wondering if it’s primarily a European thing? Then again a game where you throw a beanbag at a slanted piece of wood with a hole in it (“cornhole”) is insanely popular here, so what do I know about what games people are playing and why?
So if anybody’s reading this anywhere in the world and saying to themselves, “I was wondering how we could breathe new life into our swingball set,” here’s your chance! Take it on the road. As the creator says, make it a public art experience. Don’t keep the Shakespeare in your back yard, share it with the world.
I love that my kids are in high school now and I still get to tell Shakespeare geeklet stories.
For some reason the story has come up of when my middle daughter, who is starting her freshman year at private school, went through the interview / application process. In particular her older sister likes to remind her that when asked what grade she would give the school, she gave a realistic 8 out of 10.
“Obviously,” says my oldest, who is a junior at this school, “You tell them 10 out of 10. That’s what they want to hear.”
“Who are you, King Richard III?” my son asks.
That one gives me pause. “Love the reference,” I tell him, “But do you want to explain what that has to do with Richard III?”
“Because you just tell them what they want to hear, so you get what you want. Like the evil daughters.”
I’m a little late to the story about the National Archives’ discovery of legal documents related to Shakespeare’s father. (I have an excuse, I was right in the middle of several towns being evacuated for a gas explosion catastrophe. But! Everybody’s safe and sound in my world, so we’re very lucky to be back to our normal life sooner than a lot of people).
Are the original documents being published somewhere? Not that many of us can read secretary hand, but still. It’d be fun to try and decode the clues. (UPDATE – Looks like they’ll be available as part of Shakespeare Documented!)
Let me see if I can pull some bullet points from the article:
The documents Parry found include multiple writs against John Shakespeare, and record his debts to the Crown, including one for £132 – around £20,000 today.
That’s a pretty big number. I always thought that we’d been talking about petty amounts, like creditors chasing down somebody who stopped paying his credit cards.
A lot of people grumbled but settled [with “professional informers”]. For some reason in two cases John Shakespeare did not, and ended up targeted by the Exchequer collection system, which damaged his local credit.
I hate that “for some reason” is still in there. That’s kind of a big point. Seems like a downward spiral of getting yourself into debt in a way that doesn’t allow you to ever get out of it. But we still don’t know why he was targeted in the first place.
William grew to adulthood in a household where his father had fallen in social and economic rank, which sociologists and psychologists tell us leads to anger. They call it ‘downranking’.
Kind of puts Shakespeare’s desire for a coat of arms into a new perspective, doesn’t it?
What does everybody think? I know that there’s always a loony or two running around with a fancy new theory that will shed some light on Shakespeare’s life, and they always have a book to promote. But I’ve seen some respectable sources reporting on this, and it looks like these discovered documents could be the real thing? Has anybody explored in more depth?