Shakespearean Functional Shift

http://ianhocking.com/?p=408 I’ve seen several blogs on this subject lately, and I’m still trying to decide if this is a rehash of the older “Reading Shakespeare makes you smart” argument or if it’s entirely new research.  I’m linking this one because it seems to state the problem most clearly.  Here’s an example from Shakespeare’s Hamlet (at least, I think it is; this is how I interpret it):

No, let the candied tongue lick absurd pomp,
And crook the pregnant hinges of the knee
Where thrift may follow fawning. Dost thou hear?

The word ‘crook’ would be heard as a noun but later information forces a verb interpretation. It draws the listener towards the sentence. Its metaphor burns brightly. Philip Davis, Guillaume Thierry and Neil Roberts are investigating how the brain responds to these functional shifts.

Shakespeare Fiction Recommendations?

It occurred to me the other day that Chasing The Bard will have to end soon, despite my threat to travel to New Zealand, kidnap the author and force her to write nothing but Shakespeare stories (“Misery style”).  And then I will be sad, because it really is just that good of a story.  I think what I love best of all (and I raved about this in a past post) is that while it is fiction, she didn’t muck with the known facts.  She simply worked around them (and in the case of the Dark Lady even proposed some answers). This is substantially different from, say, Shakespeare In Love, where the story was flipped all around to suit the movie’s needs.  You folks all saw how I went bouncing off the walls when I thought that Clare Danes had misspoken a line in R+J, you can imagine how….disconcerting it is for me when somebody just helps themselves to whatever bits of Shakespeare they want, without respecting the text.   [Note – Shakey In Love actually turns out to be a great movie because of its respect for the R&J material.  It’s the fictionalization of his biography that I’m referring to.] I’m wondering what other sorts of “Shakespeare fiction” are out there.  We’ve discussed various children’s literature, I’m not really talking about that.  Nor am I talking about “slash” fiction.  I mean legit, published novels for adults that happen to derive their central plots from Shakespeare, either the man directly, or perhaps alternate versions of the stories.  Rosencrantz And Guildenstern Are Dead would be an excellent example of the latter case, successfully weaving their story in between bits of the actual play. I know that the Clockwork Orange guy (Burgess?) wrote a Shakespeare novel, but I don’t know anything about it.  I suppose I could look it up but I’m at work.  And besides I’m trying to drum up conversation, not answer my own questions. Anybody else? While I’m here I should mention Jasper Fforde, a very bizarre “lit fantasy” writer who weaves bits of Shakespeare into his stories with some regularity.  I fell in love with his ideas in the very first book when he had the Baconians coming door to door like Jehovah’s Witnesses, trying to find converts to their cause.  In a later book he actually has Hamlet play a role, but other than a few specific references to the text (“If I’m such a religious figure why would I say something so atheistic like There’s nothing either right or wrong but thinking makes it so?”  Good question!), it is a minor role.

Blame Shakespeare For The Stabbings?

http://www.westmonster.com/2008/07/to_stab_or_not_to_stab.html So apparently this Boris Johnson fellow, the mayor of London or some such, said that knife crime should not be looked upon with the glamorous image that is currently has thanks to Shakespeare characters such as Mercutio from Romeo and Juliet. I’m a little confused by the reference, since he was asked to explain who Mercutio was.  (If this was happening in America his response would have been, predictably, “Mercutio.  You know, the black guy from Lost.  He played DiCaprio’s gay friend at the party.”)  If nobody understands the reference, then can it really be said to have a “glamorous” image? I appreciate a politician trying to seriously work in an actual Shakespeare reference, and not just a random quote, however.

Good Times For Chicago Theatre

http://chicagotheaterblog.com/2008/07/15/review_midsummernightdream_aqueertale/ Here’s a quick rundown of some of Chicago’s Shakespeare choices this summer, including “Funk It Up About Nothin'”, “Desdemona: A Play About A Handkerchief”, and the main subject of the article, “A Midsummer Night’s Dream : A Queer Tale.” With forbidden lesbian and gay relationships, a Drag Queen Titania lip-syncing to Cher and Madonna and an outrageously erotic dance party fueled by euphoric intoxicants, this show celebrates the ‘old school’ joie de vivre of the community while, at the same time, illustrating the ongoing struggles for acceptance and equality. With a charming cast, fantastic soundtrack and the most playful choreography in town, this will reinvent your notions of Shakespeare in love to include sophisticated and stylized same sex subversion.