Who Do We Blame / Where Do We Start?

Fresh topic, spinning off the Gnomeo related discussions re: the Disnefication of Shakespeare.
I think we all generally agree that we’d like to see more acceptance, familiarity and understanding of Shakespeare in the world around us. We don’t want to hear that he’s hard, or boring, or complex, or irrelevant. We want our kids to approach the subject in school with excitement, not fear. We want to spot a Shakespeare reference in the wild and discover to our great joy that we’re not the only person in the room that understood it. 🙂 Fair enough? Any of those statements untrue?

Ok, next question. Why don’t we have this, and where should we focus our attention in order to fix it? I’m referring here to actual people – you can’t fix a system or an infrastructure unless you can communicate with the people who made it that way in the first place.
I figure there’s at least three logical places to start:
1) Education. I’d say “teachers”, but I don’t think that’s enough – I think many are probably constrained by curriculum requirements, standardized testing, out of date text books, stuff like that. So I’ll make this the broad category of “people who are charged with educating our children.” (NOTE, since I know I’ve got plenty of teachers reading!! I am not intending to suggest that every teacher everywhere is doing it wrong. Hardly. I’m saying, and I hope we’re in general agreement, that there is often an overall attitude toward how and when Shakespeare should be taught, that is perhaps out of date and in need of some overhaul.)
2) Parents. My kids are growing up on Shakespeare because I love it. But what about all the kids out there whose parents hated Shakespeare, and thus have no interest in instilling a love of the subject in their kids? Can we approach them, and enlighten them regarding what they missed? If we’re assuming that Shakespearean education has been somewhat broken for a very long time, we can’t hold it against the parents that they hated Shakespeare in school. We can, however, attempt to fix it.
3) The kids. “Blame” is not the right word here, but it’s a place to start. If you weren’t hanging out on this blog, when would you think to expose kids to Shakespeare? High school? Maybe middle school? Why is that, exactly, because you just trust the educational system and that’s the way it’s done? Why not elementary school? As we address a younger audience we continue to simplify, focusing more on the story and the action and less on the words. So how far back can you take that? Couldn’t I read The Tempest to my 2yr old as a bed time story? What’s the difference between that and Cinderella? If we start by assuming that there are certain kids who simply should not be exposed to Shakespeare, I think we’re doing them a disservice.
There’s no right answer – the only right answer is, obviously, “start everywhere.” What I’m looking for is the chink in the proverbial armor (so to speak). The place where, if we focused enough energy, we’d break through and cause some real change.

Shakespeare Got To Get Paid, Son

You may have seen the NY Times article going around, but Slate’s got a quick summary if you prefer. A bunch of authors (James Shapiro among them – is he our James Shapiro?) get together and argue that only through the invention of the paybox, so that authors could profit from their works, did the world see the likes of Shakespeare, Marlowe, etc…. If they weren’t getting paid for their work, they would not have existed.
That may be a gross summary of a summary, but I don’t have time to get into it right now. The whole point of the article is pro-copyright, anti-Web (at least, the aspect of the web that says “blah blah blah everything should be free”).
Discuss.

Who Wants Free Stuff?

Regularly I get offers to review product. Got one today, as a matter of fact. Sometimes the request will come with, “And do you know any other Shakespeare bloggers who might be interested?”

It dawned on me today that while yes, yes I do, I do not always have contact info for those people. (I’m looking most directly at you, Bill from Shakespeare Teacher. Hint hint.)
So, fellow Shakespeare bloggers – if you’d like to be considered when publicists come knocking on my door, please take a moment and drop me a note saying so. I’ll tuck it away in a list someplace so I can find it next time I need it. I can’t promise anything about when such offers might come along, but I can say that if you’re not on my list then you won’t get mentioned – that way nobody’s wasting anybody’s time if you’re not interested in doing reviews.
You all know me, you know I’m not going to go spamming you. In general my method has always been to forward the publicist’s request to the blogger, and let you make up your mind, rather than just randomly handing out your address to whoever asks for it.
If you’d like to be on the list, please specify the URL of your web site so I can tell people about it. Thank you.

Guerilla Gnomeo

Just had a great idea. This weekend my kids spotted actual Gnomeo and Juliet merchandise! In this case, one of those sticker books that we get to keep our kids happy – 12 pages of like 100 stickers, and half a dozen blank scenes to fill. At the time I had no interest in dropped $7 each on 3 copies of the same book, though I was pleasantly surprised to see at least some attempt at merchandising.
But then, just this morning in fact, I had an idea. Why don’t *I* get one of those books for myself, and then plaster the stickers all over town? A little guerilla marketing?
What the heck, can’t hurt, right?

Next Up for Ralph Fiennes? More Romans…

The most interesting bit about this article on Ralph Fiennes’ Coriolanus movie is his plan for more Shakespeare!

Fiennes may not be done with bringing Shakespeare to the screen; he says he could imagine taking on “Antony and Cleopatra.”

“Not only is it an extraordinarily great love story, but it’s written arguably quite cinematically,” he said. “I can’t help feeling (that), if Shakespeare was alive today, he would write very easily for the cinema.”

Nice. We could use another A&C.