Your Shakespeare Geek Lives In Boston

I live just outside of Boston.  No, I was not in town when the unthinkable happened.  I did have family and friends there.  My sister-in-law’s brother (and his wife, whatever that makes her to me) were there.  My daughter’s 5th grade teacher was there.  A parent from my daughters’ Irish step dancing class was there.  A cub scout father was there.  My young coworkers have many friends at colleges throughout Boston, all of whom were there.  To the best of my ability to track them, all are safe (although each of them, in turn, has friends and acquaintances who were affected more severely).

In an upcoming post you’ll hear me refer to Shakespeare as my comfort.  Shakespeare’s words are what I turn to when I am unable to otherwise express what I might be feeling at any given time.

What words does Shakespeare have for Boston at a time like this?  I’m honestly asking.  I don’t want grief over the fallen.  I know that.  I want something more, something that speaks to our strength, that we will rise up out of this chaos stronger than we were before.

Help me.

Shakespeare Day is Coming

I’m sure everybody knows we celebrate a very special day on April 23.  I long ago got tired of alternately referring to it as Shakespeare’s Birthday and The Day Shakespeare Died and decided to make it my own personal holiday.  Around here we call it Shakespeare Day.

I celebrate by posting all day.
In 2009 I had 9 posts.
In 2010 I had 12.
In 2011 Shakespeare Day was a Saturday, which made it impossible to meaningfully celebrate online.
So I made up for it in 2012 with *25* posts.
I plan on breaking that record again this year. I’ve already begun queueing up the posts, and I encourage people to come back to the site frequently throughout the day because they will scroll into the archives rapidly at that rate and if the past is any indicator there’ll be a whole lot of conversation going on in many different threads.
If you don’t see me around between now and then it’s because I’m catching up on my old requests, queuing up new posts, thinking about new topics, and researching interesting links.  If you’ve ever wanted to get a link in front of me, hint hint, now’s the time to do it.

It Begins….Again!

Y’all know me, I never give up.  Earlier this year I mentioned to all my children’s teachers that I would volunteer to do a unit on Shakespeare for their class, tuned however they like.  A couple weeks ago my middle geeklet’s teacher sent a note home asking for more information.   So I promptly wrote her a lengthy bunch of suggestions, and never heard back.

That’s because she never got it.  Tonight was one of those “academic fairs” where the parents wander around the school looking at our kids’ projects, and sure enough this teacher came up to me and asked for more details.  I asked if she’d ever gotten the email, she said she had not.

So!  Here’s how I pitched it, just to put some scope on it.  I told her that we can tackle the subject one of three ways:

1)  History/biography.  Who Shakespeare was, when he lived, what was going on at the time, what role he plays in history, that sort of thing.  Probably the least interesting, but also the easiest and most straightforward.  (The kids’ projects we were looking at were all biographies, so it tied in).

2) Poetry/Meter/Rhyme/Memorization.  I know that each grade does some degree of poetry work so I know that this could fit in easily with their regularly scheduled plans.

3) Get them out of their seats and performing some scenes!  I emphasized that this is by far the most fun and most valuable but that it’s also got the most variables – finding acceptable scenes, dealing with the shy kids, managing head count, etc…  (I’m sure you directors don’t see any of those as a hurdle but if I’m going to get one shot at this I don’t want to spend 90% of the time trying to coax a kid out of his seat, or convince a boy to play a girl’s role.)

#3 is her clear favorite, and as “head teacher” she doesn’t think that there’ll be any obstacles.  So it looks like we’re on….again!

If anybody’s got pointers to scene selections appropriate for 8yr olds, send them my way.  I’ve got some copies of “Shakespeare for Kids” and “60 Minute Shakespeare” around here someplace so I’m going to try those as well.  Both of those are modern translations that leave in key passages, which might be the easiest way to go for an introduction.

Yay!

Rogert Ebert, At The Shakespeare Movies

You likely know by now that legendary film critic Roger Ebert has lost his battle with cancer and is at long last reunited with his partner Gene Siskel who passed away a good number of years ago.  In tribute I went through his review archives to see what he had to say about Shakespeare on film.

Kenneth Branagh’s Hamlet

“…long but not slow, deep but not difficult, and it vibrates with the relief of actors who have great things to say, and the right ways to say them….Branagh’s version moved me, entertained me and made me feel for the first time at home in that doomed royal court.”

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19970124/REVIEWS/701240303/1023

Ok, then, what about Hamlet 2?

“The problem with a sequel to Hamlet is that everybody interesting is dead by the end. That doesn’t discourage Dana Marschz, a Tucson high school drama teacher, from trying to save the school’s theater program with a sequel named “Hamlet 2.” … he brings back the dead characters, plus Jesus, Einstein and the very much alive Hillary Clinton.”

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080821/REVIEWS/331


A Midsummer Night’s Dream

Whether you’re a follower of Harold Bloom or not, how cool is it that a movie critic can drop his name like that?

“Why is Shakespeare so popular with filmmakers when he contains so few car chases and explosions? Because he is the measuring stick by which actors and directors test themselves. His insights into human nature are so true that he has, as Bloom argues in his book, actually created our modern idea of the human personality. Before Hamlet asked, “to be, or not to be?,” dramatic characters just were. Ever since, they have known and questioned themselves. Even in a comedy like “Midsummer,” there are quick flashes of brilliance that help us see ourselves. “What fools these mortals be,” indeed.”

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19990514/REVIEWS/905140304/1023


Much Ado about Much Ado

“…this is not a film “of” a Shakespeare play, but a film that begins with the same materials and the wonderful language and finds its own reality. It is cheerful from beginning to end.”

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19930521/REVIEWS/305210302


Twefth Night, or, Did I Mention Romeo+Juliet Sucks?

I’m guessing that these two movies came out at roughly the same time? 

The period has been moved up to the 18th century, and the dialogue has been slightly simplified and clarified, but Shakespeare’s language is largely intact (and easier to understand than in Baz Luhrmann’s new “Romeo & Juliet”).

Shakespeare’s language is not hard to understand when spoken by actors who are comfortable with the rhythm and know the meaning. It can be impenetrable when declaimed by unseasoned actors with more energy than experience (as the screaming gang members in “Romeo & Juliet” demonstrate).

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19961108/REVIEWS/611080305/1023


Wait… Peter Brooks’ King Lear? How old was Ebert?!

I was surprised to find this review of the 1972 film.  I immediately went searching for an Ebert review of the legendary Dream but alas I could not.  (Turns out that Ebert started reviewing movies in 1967, by the way.)

“Shakespeare’s Lear survives in his play and, will endure forever. Brook’s Lear is a new conception, a rethinking, and a critical commentary on the play. It is interestingly precisely because it contrasts so firmly with Shakespeare’s universe; by deliberately omitting all faith and hope from Lear’s kingdom, it paradoxically helps us to see how much is there.”

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19721031/REVIEWS/210310301/1023


Step Aside, Private Ryan.  Somebody loves Shakespeare in Love

“A movie like this is a reminder of the long thread that connects Shakespeare to the kids opening tonight in a storefront on Lincoln Avenue: You get a theater, you learn the lines, you strut your stuff, you hope there’s an audience, you fall in love with another member of the cast, and if sooner or later your revels must be ended, well, at least you reveled.”

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19981225/REVIEWS/812250306/1023

I’m going to leave it there, because I like that last line.  Your revels now are ended, Mr. Ebert.   Flights of angels sing thee to thy rest.