Brace Yourselves. It’s Time.

“We start Romeo and Juliet next week!”

It was the moment I’ve literally been waiting eight years for.  Last night at dinner, my daughter informed me that her class was starting Shakespeare this week.

My children have literally been raised on Shakespeare – my oldest since she was old enough to ask me questions, my middle since before she can remember, and my youngest since before he could walk (he saw his first Tempest while still in a stroller).

August, 2007.  Or this one from March 2006 where I even wrote, “My daughter is only four and it pains me that I can’t share Shakespeare with her yet.”

I have Shakespeare action figures in the house. My phone plays “Shall I Compare Thee To A Summer’s Day” (as sung by Pink Floyd’s David Gilmour).  My children start asking me questions about Shakespeare, and the journey begins.  It’s been around them since before they can remember, of course, but now we can actually interact on the subject.  The link is just one of many, many stories I’ve posted over the years.

Many times I have gone into classrooms to volunteer, knowing full well that second and third graders are unlikely to understand and retain the original language. Instead, my mission has always been to break the stigma of Shakespeare as difficult and boring, something to be dreaded.  I will often say to classrooms, “Even if you don’t understand everything that we talked about today, one day years from now when you’re in high school, a teacher is going to drop Romeo and Juliet in front of you and while some of the kids groan and roll their eyes, you’re going to be the ones to say, “Ohhhhhhh!  I get this!” Obviously my children will be the ones to lead by example. Their friends and schoolmates will only see me a couple of times a year (if that).  My children eat sleep and breathe it.

And now that day is here. Has the mission been a success? Is my daughter going to fly through the class, bringing all kinds of passion for the subject with her to share? Will the teacher discover the junior Shakespeare geeklet she’s destined to become?

Her first assignment is to write a sonnet.  So I suppose that the teacher’s doing some sort of crash course in all things Shakespeare before diving into the play, which is fine and probably necessary. She tells me that part of the assignment is to write an actual, good sonnet and not just count syllables, and I nod my approval at this teacher’s standards.  I ask what she knows about sonnets, she says something about syllables and then tells me that they literally just started today, so they haven’t covered much.  I ask her what a “volta” is, and tell her to get back to me when the class gets that far.

I ask whether she’s at all mentioned that she was raised on Shakespeare, has known Sonnet 18 since she was five years old, and along with her siblings can count herself as the youngest person to ever see the inside of the Folger Shakespeare vault.  She said, “It hasn’t come up.”

It turns out that she’s deathly afraid of her Shakespeare teacher.  He’s one of those guys with a dark, sarcastic sense of humor that’s very intimidating to the students. I’ve seen it in action, and I’m not a fan. But I’ve seen it only briefly, through my daughter’s filter, so I may have been too hard on the guy. It’s quite possible that I’d get along with him swimmingly. He’s a good teacher, her grades are good. He’s just not the kind of guy students feel that they can have any sort of extra conversation with.

I remind my daughter that this has been years in the making and she will be missing a tremendous opportunity if she doesn’t say *something*.  I fully expect that most of the other students in the room know her relationship to Shakespeare, so maybe one of them will say something.  Even if he’d asked, “Is anyone already familiar with Shakespeare?” she would have had the opportunity to say any number of things, she’s got a literal lifetime of relevant stories.

The best possible outcome is that she does mention it, the teacher is receptive, and I get to come in and volunteer in that class.  I’m not holding out hope, though, because as the kids have gotten older the room for volunteer parents in that capacity has approached nil.  In elementary school, any diversion from the norm is seen as interesting and entertaining for the students, a break from the pattern, and is welcome. But as they get older it’s more about “What are you teaching them, how much time are you spending on that topic, and how are you going to measure it? Ok, great, move on. Repeat.”  I can keep my fingers crossed – honestly, I won’t be able to help it, I’ll be thinking of what I’d say if given the chance – but I have to be prepared for the opposite end of the spectrum, which is that she tells him and he doesn’t care, and it turns into just a regular series of lessons like with geometry where the teacher says one thing, then my daughter comes home and I explain all the good and interesting stuff that the teacher has chosen to gloss over.

I will report back regularly.  Brace yourselves, it’s going to be a bumpy ride!

Happy Shakespeare Fools’ Day! #shakespearefoolsday

We’re trying a little something different this year. In celebration of Shakespeare’s oft-underappreciated clown princes of comedy, Bardfilm and I thought we should declare today

Shakespeare Fools’ Day

Whether you’re a professional fool or you just behave like one, celebrate the craft of your predecessors today by acting the part.

Ask strangers their names, and then when they tell you, say, “I do not like that name.”
At the morning work meeting, request that all the tasks be assigned to you. Explain at length why you are qualified for every role. Try not to let anyone make an ass of you.
Had eggs for breakfast? Give the shells to someone and say, “Look! I have given you two crowns!”
Get drunk with your best friend, accuse him of lying. Then deny it. (Don’t be surprised if you get hit.)
Dress in robe and fake beard. Tell everyone you’re a curate, and cure them of their lunacy.
Carry around a letter, muttering to yourself, “M, O, A, I” and trying to pronounce it.  Before the end of the day, announce “EVERY ONE OF THESE LETTERS ARE IN MY NAME!” Even if they aren’t.
Go to bed at noon.
How do you spend your Shakespeare Fools’ Day?

Guest Post: Shakespeare’s Skull and the Usual Suspects

Now that we know that Shakespeare’s skull is no longer in his grave with the rest of his mortal coil, Bardfilm and I know that the time has come to round up the usual suspects. Without much ado, here are the people we’d call in for interrogation:

Amateur dramatic company of Stratford who borrowed it for a production of Hamlet and, because of poor reviews, decided not to return it.

Enraged Macbeth descendants who thought “a head for a head” was a pretty good policy (they’re also responsible for moving Stratford forest closer to the birthplace).

Phrenologists from the 1700s wanting to discover the “literary genius bump schematic.”

Literary critics from the future determined to paint it an inch thick to see what favor it would come to.

Prank by George W. Bush for the Skull and Bones society gone horribly awry.

Someone playing Jaques who had a really weird interpretation of the seven ages of man “sans everything” line he wanted to try.

Some well wisher who no doubt thought that Shakespeare could not be sent to his account with all his imperfections on his head if he had no head.

Somewhere, somebody obsessed with Ophelia has got his head in her lap.

The people in charge of the Richard III archeological dig getting a bit carried away.

Marketing department of Skullcandy™ thought they had a brilliant new campaign. Abandoned because of a surprising outbreak of good taste and tact.

“Shakespeare Geek took it—it’s just the sort of silly trick he’s been playing since he walked along the railroad tracks of Boston as a kid.” —Bardfilm

“Bardfilm is the one who took it. That guy has no shame when it comes to shameless self-promotion.” —Shakespeare Geek

Bearded old woman (can’t call them witches anymore, sargent, that’s not “politically correct.” And they’re not too keen on “wyrd,” either) caught wandering down by the river chanting “Fillet of a fenny snake, / Cranium of Willy Shake.”

Treasure hunters found with a copy of Richard III in which the “wedges of gold, great anchors, heaps of pearl, inestimable stones, unvalued jewels” laying in dead men’s skulls passage was underlined.

Caliban, who we expect may have battered it with a log. He’s also suspect in what happened to all the books.

Pistol, who was unable to satisfactorily explain why he was carrying a leek without a permit

Guildenstern, for completely misunderstanding a recent “throwing about of brains.”

Did anyone bother to scan his heels? Lear’s Fool suggested that we might find it down there.

Our thanks for the idea for this guest post to kj, the author of Bardfilm. Bardfilm is a blog that comments on films, plays, and other matters related to Shakespeare.

 

Review : The Fosters – Romeo and Juliet

I think I would have liked this show 20 or 30 years ago.  When I was closer to high school. This just made me feel old.

Look, every sitcom in history that’s had anything to do with a high school or high school aged students, from Head of the Class to The Brady Bunch, has at one point or another done a Romeo and Juliet episode. But not too many attempt to pull off a rock musical version.  Not only that, they had alumni from High School Musical and Glee helping out (including Corbin Bleu as Mercutio).  So I wanted to have high hopes.

As always, and I think seriously this has become my trademark, my review is this:  “Needs more Shakespeare.”

I don’t know the show, or the characters, or their arcs. So I’m sure that I missed the lion’s share of the significance of what else was going on, who kissed who, who used to be a couple but broke up and are now on stage together. But you know what? This is where I feel old.  Because I didn’t care.  I just wanted to hear the text.

It started out well, singing the prologue to piano accompaniment. The song itself wasn’t that good, but I applaud the effort.  But just about all the other songs had little to no text in them, and instead were focused on this theme of being “unbreakable” and/or “unstoppable”, whatever significance that is supposed to have, and also how “love will light the way.”  There’s a token reference to jesting at scars that never felt a wound, which is a repeated lyric in one of the songs, but out of context it’s just kind of hanging there.

Meanwhile there’s a whole other story arc going on that just reminded me that these people are closer to my kids’ age than my own.  Example?  Ok, picture this.  Set against the backdrop of SHAKESPEARE, here’s some actual dialogue:

“I’m still in love with you!”
“Then why didn’t you answer my note?”
“What note?”
“I left a note in your backpack.”
“I never got it. What did it say?”
“That I’m in love with you too.”

Whoa.  I’ve got to sit down for a minute. For a brief minute there I got a kick out of the parallel of an important letter gone unread, but I couldn’t get over the overly dramatic dialogue over something so childish.  But then I suppose if I’d let my kids watch this show they would have thought it’s the greatest thing in the world.

Oh, well.  I’ll still probably try to download some of the songs again to see if full versions are available, and if they do more justice to the text than I first noticed.  But I’m pretty sure it’s not going to knock off Hamilton anytime soon.

 

Whoa. Wait. What?

Tell me if something in this headline catches your eye like it did mine:

What the heck is a “previously unknown” folio? You don’t just drop something like that into a headline and walk away.  Everybody knows that all the “known” Folios (233) are accounted for and micro-catalogued, and if Christie’s had one in its collection, surely it would not be a secret, would it? Surely this is some fancy word wrangling for publicity, like everybody calling Sir Thomas More “Shakespeare’s Last Play” and “The Only Play Written in Shakespeare’s Handwriting.”

“…and the volume for sale at Christie’s is a new addition to that list.”

Interesting!  Tell me more. How can this be?

Christie’s estimates the previously unrecorded copy currently for sale will fetch £800,000–1.2 million (about $1.16 million–1.74 million). It has not been seen by the public in over two centuries, and last changed hands in 1800, when it was purchased by book collector George Augustus Shuckburgh-Evelyn (1751–1804).

I’m having trouble getting my head around this.  You mean to tell me that the people who run this sort of thing have had one of the most rare and valuable books in the world in its collection, potentially for centuries, and not only did they not let anybody see it, THEY DIDN’T EVEN TELL ANYBODY IT EXISTED??

What’s next up for auction, all of Shakespeare’s personal library, Amelia Earhart’s skeleton and the Holy Grail?