Some of my most potentially productive work time is during the commute. I’ve got a good hour a day where I’m going to be listening to my ipod *anyway*, so I might as well make use of it. Typically I’ll follow a variety of podcasts, and occasionally an audio book.
I’ve never been much for Shakespeare via audio. But, that can change.
So, this is an open discussion – who is putting out audio Shakespeare content? Tell me. If you’ve got your own show, this is your opportunity to plug it.
I’ll tell you what I’m looking for. I don’t want to listen to audio versions of the plays. I don’t have that level of concentration while driving. Likewise, i don’t want to listen to a show where people do nothing but talk about their own personal opinions of Shakespeare – that’s far more likely to bore me in the other direction. The ideal content for me would be a heavy amount of Shakespeare, condensed for presentation, if that makes sense. I don’t need two hours’ traffic of my MP3 player – how about doing selected scenes? Or encapsulating info on a play that maybe I’m not as familiar with, so that I can come up to speed? If somebody said “Here’s a series of podcasts where we spend 1 hour per play” I would almost certainly pick through it and grab the plays I’m least familiar with. But while I may find “Here’s a podcast on nothing but Hamlet” interesting, it wouldn’t be for me — for something like that I need to be able to read and skim, because I know that there’s an infinite amount to talk about and I want to decide for myself where the interesting bits are.
So, who’s got one?

I bookmarked this conversation over on reddit too late to join in the fun, but I thought that my Shakespeare Geek readers might get a serious kick out of what happens when you put the problem in front of geeks of the more traditional sense.
I can’t really hold my own with the kind of mathematical experience they’ve got over there, but the way I’ve always imagined it is that “infinite” and “all” are, for the purposes of an abstract problem such as this, basically interchangeable. If you have a problem set of X possibilities, and then you say that you’re generating an infinite number of variations on X, then by definition one of them will be X.
Any attempt to discuss how long this would take, or the odds that it could ever happen, or comparison to atoms in the universe, seems to miss the point entirely.
The closest I’ve seen to an argument that makes me curious is the idea that by saying “monkey” you are not necessarily saying “a true random number generator.” Therefore you could argue that even with an infinite number of monkeys, your distribution does not follow a normal random distribution, and thus you can’t do predictions based on that curve.

Over on Shakespeare Answers, somebody asked Why Iago asks Roderigo to kill Cassio. In writing up my answer, I noticed something that strikes me as an odd gap, almost like Shakespeare did it on purpose.

Check out the end of Act 4, Scene 2:

IAGO

Why, by making him uncapable of Othello’s place;
knocking out his brains.

RODERIGO

And that you would have me to do?

IAGO

Ay, if you dare do yourself a profit and a right.
He sups to-night with a harlotry, and thither will I
go to him: he knows not yet of his horrorable
fortune. If you will watch his going thence, which
I will fashion to fall out between twelve and one,
you may take him at your pleasure: I will be near
to second your attempt, and he shall fall between
us. Come, stand not amazed at it, but go along with
me; I will show you such a necessity in his death
that you shall think yourself bound to put it on
him. It is now high suppertime, and the night grows
to waste: about it.

RODERIGO

I will hear further reason for this.

IAGO

And you shall be satisfied.

Iago has stated to Roderigo that to keep Othello and Desdemona for leaving for Mauritania, they need to remove Cassio from the picture (since he would be the one left in charge). When Roderigo asks why he has to do it, Iago says “I’ll show you why he has to die, and you’ll be in such agreement that you’ll want to be the one to do it.”

When we next see them, however?

RODERIGO

I have no great devotion to the deed;
And yet he hath given me satisfying reasons:
‘Tis but a man gone. Forth, my sword: he dies

I must be missing something, because on this rainy Monday morning that reads almost comically to me – I envision Iago putting his arm around Roderigo, walking off stage saying “Let me explain it to you…” and then 2 seconds later them coming back on stage with Roderigo saying, “Oh, ok, I understand, that makes sense.” It’s like Shakespeare didn’t really have a good answer to that question so he phoned that one in.

What am I missing?

http://www.flocabulary.com/muchado
There’s lots of projects like this floating around the net, but I like and link this one for a few reasons:

* It comes with an animated video
* It’s about Much Ado About Nothing, not R+J or Hamlet or the other most common ones
* It’s actually good. 🙂
They call me Shakespeare and I’mma make clear
When I write it’s on, my pen is my rapier
Dug for “pen is mightier than the sword” reference, even if that isn’t Shakespeare. 🙂

Question for a Friday : Which play spans the longest amount of time on stage? Stories and flashbacky sorts of things about what once happened don’t count, I mean “In Act 1 scene 1 the time is X, and in Act 5 the time is X + a whole bunch.” Does Winter’s Tale win, where Time “slides o’er sixteen years”?
On the flip side, which play takes the shortest amount of time? Doesn’t The Tempest span just as couple of hours, from the time of the shipwreck to the time of reuniting?