Following up on our previous story about 14yr old Hainlee Steinfeld possibly getting naked for her turn as Juliet, the director has confirmed that it’s not happening. The rumor came about because the script – which clearly says “get naked” – had been leaked, so when the 14yr old was cast, it didn’t take long to put 2 and 2 together.
The script was written with a 20yr old actress, the director tells us. Once an age-appropriate Juliet was cast, they went back and snipped all the naked stuff.
I will cut the director some slack for assuming that he was using the gossip mill to generate buzz for his movie with the story. I won’t, however, forgive him for the quote in the original story where he said that he went with a 14 yr old girl for Juliet because “that’s the way Shakespeare did it.”
The 2005 Commonwealth Hamlet Continues to Haunt Me
I have seen Commonwealth Shakespeare in Park on Boston Common for many years now. I have seen their Midsummer, As You Like It, Comedy of Errors, Much Ado, Macbeth, Shrew, and Othello. I want to say I may have even seen them do a Tempest, a long time ago. But there’s one that I missed.
It’s 2005. They’re doing Hamlet. To the best of my knowledge they’ve not done Lear, so I try to explain to those close to me that this is, like, *it*. The big one. The must see. My wife and I have arranged to meet up with friends for dinner at a nice nearby restaurant (Number 9 Park, if you know the area) for the last weekend of the performance. When the day arrives? Torrential rains are in the forecast. I am not missing Hamlet. We head into town, and the rain begins. We’re not even sure our friends will make it in. It is a few hours before showtime, and I am using my phone (which, 6 years ago, was no iPhone let me tell you!) to keep trying the CommShakes homepage to see whether the show has been cancelled, and I see no notice. I call the number, but only ever get an answering machine. It is *nasty* outside. Raining cats and dogs. There is no way there is a show tonight.
But…15 minutes before showtime? The rain stops. Sun comes out. Hurray! I rush over to where the show is to be – empty, of course, except for some stage hands tending to the flooded sets. “I’m here!” I say, “Start the show! The rain’s stopped!”
They looked at me like I was insane. Perhaps, at that moment, I was. My wife (our friends had bailed) led me away as carefully as she might have led a mental patient while I just repeated “But….it stopped raining. Hamlet. It’s not raining anymore…..”
Thus did I miss my chance to see Hamlet in the park. But hey, I’m not bitter! I’ve seen their Comedy of Errors, and that’s just as good, right? Right?? 🙂 I have never again waited until the last weekend to see a show. I’ve even gone so far (the Midsummer year) to see the show once myself first, and then see it again with friends.
My point in rehashing that story is to link to what’s become of their Hamlet, Jeffrey Donovan. He’s now the star of the television series “Burn Notice”, and is coming back into town for a staged reading of a play called “Burn This”, something I don’t really know anything about.
Check out these quotes from the article, which I’m sure was written just to taunt me…
“That was, to this day, one of the greatest experiences of my life,’’ Donovan says. “To not only be given one of the most cherished and difficult roles in Shakespeare’s canon, but to do it in front of my hometown, basically. . . . It gives me chills even now.’’Maler says the production was one of the highlights of the company’s history: “Seeing the way the audiences of Boston, and particularly young audiences, would gravitate toward his performance was unlike anything I’ve ever seen.’’
Argh. Why can’t I get *that* on DVD? I get enough David Tennant. Where’s the CommShakes petition?
Mad Libs Shakespeare
The inventor of Mad Libs, Leonard B. Stern, has died.
It seems only fair to mark his passing with a little Mad Libs Shakespeare. This is a quicky so it’s not formatted well (and you basically have to DIY), don’t read the second half until you’re ready to fill in:
1 Verb
3 Noun
4 Noun
5 Verb
6 Plural noun
7 Plural noun
8 Adjective
9 Noun
10 Plural noun
11 Noun
12 Plural noun
13 Verb
14 Verb
15 Verb
17 Number
18 Adjective
19 Plural noun
20 Noun
21 Past-tense verb
(*) I realize that a few numbers are missing, I realized after doing this that words were repeated but didn’t feel like renumbering all the slots 🙂
To __1__, or not to __1___: that is the __3___:
Whether ’tis nobler in the __4___ to __5___
The __6___ and __7___ of __8___ __9___,
Or to take _10____ against a __11___ of __12___,
And by opposing __13___ them? To __14___: to __15___;
No more; and by a __15___ to say we end
The heart-ache and the _17____ __18___ __19____
Summer Shakespeare : Creative Ideas?
I hope that regular reader/contributor Bill doesn’t mind me reposting this message he sent me on Facebook, but I thought it would make great conversation and surely more opinions on a question like this is better than a few.
Question: I’ll be teaching a semester long Shakespeare class this year. If you were in high school again, and were able to take a class like this, what are some issues that you’d like to tackle.
Reading list: Othello, Shrew, Merchant, Tempest, and one more, undecided.
Any thoughts?
I’m not sure the range he has to work with (i.e. is he specifically asking about parts of the text to study in detail, or ways to structure activities in the class), but maybe he’ll chime in with answers.
One thing that comes to mind, which I take from the local Rebel Shakespeare group here, is to include performance. Public performance. “Bill’s Class Presents, Scenes from Shakespeare!” Preferably outdoor, if you can find a place. Or in a classroom if you must. Get friends and family to come. Nicely combines the ideas of “Shakespeare must be performed”, demonstrating / showing off what you’ve learned, as well as serving as a sort of informal final exam / graduation ceremony.
As for the texts themselves, why not make that undecided one something from the later plays, like Winter’s Tale or Cymbeline? It seems like The Tempest is it for the later stuff, that’s all kids ever see. I think it’s important to show that not every play met the structured definition of history / tragedy / comedy. I suppose Tempest covers that, but so often discussion of that play is all about it as Shakespeare’s farewell to the stage, and less on questions of “It’s not really a comedy or a tragedy, what is it?”
Although the idea has been done to death, I’m sure that today’s high school kids would get a kick out anything involving new/social media mixed with Shakespeare. We have no end of Twitter/Facebook versions of the plays. You could perhaps have them come up with something in that area. We certainly didn’t have that when I was in high school! 🙂
Who else has ideas for Bill?
The Real Ophelia?
Sound familiar? The scholars who spotted it are quick to ponder whether this is the story that was in Shakespeare’s head when he created Ophelia. Sure, he would have only been 5 at the time – and he wrote Hamlet nearly 40 years later, but it’s certainly reasonable to think that he would have known the story and it could have served as inspiration. The fact that her name is almost identical to his suggests that she could have even been a relation. If not, the common name would have helped to keep the story in his memory.
What I’m finding a bit of a deja vu is …. didn’t we know this? The details may be new but I could swear that we knew about some real factual evidence for the goings-on in Hamlet. Am I thinking of a different story? Does anybody know what I’m thinking about? I know that somewhere in my reading (and I think it was in a regular book, not on the net, which is why I’m having trouble googling it) I read about the death of someone that would have been local to Shakespeare, that may have served as a model for someone in one of his plays. Maybe I’m just backfilling the story to be about Ophelia, but it’s going to bug me until I know for sure what story I’m thinking of.
UPDATED On a clue from Sean, the other source is Katherine Hamlet (or possibly Hamnet, but still…) What’s really weird is that Sylvia over at TheShakespeareBlog wrote this up two weeks ago, and apparently had not yet seen the new 1569 finding?! Check it: http://theshakespeareblog.com/?p=233
Shaxpere? Hamlet? Is somebody pulling our leg, here? Seriously.