Why Do I Hate This David Tennant As Macbeth Video?

~ duane ~ 2 Comments

Ok I was excited at a chance to see some footage of David Tennant’s Macbeth (coming soon to a theatre probably not near you). If you’ve never seen Mr. Tennant play the villain, go check out his turn in Marvel’s Jessica Jones series. That recognizable accent that can so readily make ’em all swoon can easily switch to something more Satan than Seyton. Can’t wait to see what he does with the Scottish Play.

Ready?

I Hate It

I try very hard to find something to love in all Shakespeare performances, and I’ll probably watch this 12 times and find something. But on the first watch? I’m bothered by it, and I figured out why.

He’s looking at the camera, and I want him to stop.

It’s often asked about Shakespeare’s soliloquies. Who is the actor talking to? We know that the point is to share information with the audience, to get at the character’s inner thoughts in a way not otherwise available. But eye contact turns that from “we happened to overhear something we maybe shouldn’t be privvy to” into, “You’re in the story now, and I’m deliberately telling you this.” That makes you Macbeth’s confidante. And I think that takes away from his character. I want an insane Macbeth, someone paranoid with no idea who he can trust. I don’t want to be some trusted friend.

Maybe it will be different. Who knows, perhaps this is a little featurette they made just for this purpose, and it’s not actually in the play this way. That’d be annoying for different reasons, We all hate it when the trailer contains scenes or soundtrack that aren’t in the final product. Or maybe it’s there, but its limited, so Macbeth talks to us in the first half, working out the plan and telling us his fears because clearly he’s afraid to voice them to his wife, but then after the murders he just kind of forgets we’re there. That might be able to work.

When does it work?

Bardfilm and I were discussing this morning about when and how this technique can work. In live theatre, it’s possible for the actor to pick out a specific seat in the audience and direct a whole speech at them. This probably works for the rest of the audience, since they still get the same experience. But what of that person? I think I’d want that to stop immediately. I don’t want to be part of the show.

It came to mind that Hamlet might be fun to add this element. Hamlet’s famous opening line is one that only we hear, “A little more than kin and less than kind.” Imagine he said that looking directly at you. So now you’re basically Horatio, you’re the witness to what’s going on,. Now it’s different. I don’t want to be in on it with Macbeth. But I want to be there for Hamlet. Does that make sense? If Hamlet knows I’m here, Hamlet’s not alone.

What do you think, do you want to be pulled into the play like this?

Macbeth Videogame? TAKE MY MONEY

~ duane ~ 1 Comment

https://www.whatsonstage.com/news/rsc-announces-new-video-game-inspired-by-macbeth_1661745

Ok, this is the kind of story that makes me want to blog again. The actual RSC – you know, the Royal Shakespeare Company – is getting behind a Shakespeare videogame project based on Macbeth.

There have been a lot of Shakespeare video games strewn throughout our history: point-and-click adventures, space shooters, and massive online role-playing games. Sadly, I’m unsure I can point to any that still exist. I always have a notebook of ideas that, should I someday win the lottery and have infinite time and resources at my disposal, I will absolutely bring into reality.

That doesn’t mean we can’t keep hoping, though.

Set in contemporary Iran, the game features Cannes Best Actress winner Zar Amir as Lady Macbeth. This marks the RSC’s first venture into video gaming, with the game co-produced by Zar’s Paris-based Alambic Production.

Lili is a screen life thriller that allows players to access Lady Macbeth’s personal devices, blending live-action cinema with interactive gameplay. The game immerses players in a stylised, neo-noir vision of modern Iran, where surveillance and authoritarianism are prevalent. Players will make choices that influence Lady Macbeth’s destiny, with Macbeth’s witches reimagined as hackers.

Well, I hate the “blending live-action cinema with interactive gameplay” idea. That reminds me of many failed attempts to integrate laser disc and similar technologies where basically all you got was a jumpy “Cut scene … menu of choices … cut scene …. menu of choices…” and under the covers it’s little more than a “choose your own adventure” book.

AI generated Shakespeare playing videogames

But, we’ll reserve judgment. What I love (and I think my daughter will love too) is, “make choices that influence Lady Macbeth’s destiny.” In my old age I’ve become a fan of Lady Macbeth, and see all kinds of interesting interpretations of the play from her perspective. When did she have the baby, was it long ago or recently? As a married couple, are they still trying, or have they given up (or possibly been told it can’t happen)? What was her relationship with her father? So much backstory to fill for her.

Setting it in Iran brings all kinds of new gender issues to the story. Lady Macbeth’s whole thing is “I can’t do that because I’m not a man.”

I’m excited for a new videogame to try, though I have to admit it looks like a fancy interactive theatre experiment. We’ll have to see how it looks when it’s finished!

BETA Testers Wanted

Shakespeare Plays Browser - React and TailwindCSS
~ duane ~ 2 Comments

I’ve been unemployed for several months, and I’m not enjoying it. As a “full stack” software engineer, and an old one at that, one of the biggest hurdles to getting through the job interview game is keeping specific technical skills up to date. I was at my last job for eight years, so there are many things I never got to touch. That’s working against me.

I want to change that. Technology doesn’t exist in a vacuum, however. Reading a book or taking a course is not enough to say, “Sure, I know that language,” any more than it would be true for Italian or Icelandic. You have to use what you’re learning, internalize (grok!) it, and be able to speak confidently that you know what you’re talking about.

With that in mind, I will use the site as a canvas for learning projects. While I could create a new site for this, I’ve already got the domain, the hosting, and the traffic here, so I might as well use it. It also goes toward that “not in a vacuum” thing. I can add features here that are useful and not just another to-do list manager.

Presenting My React + TailwindCSS Shakespeare Browser

Several months ago, with the help of generative AI, I put together some resource pages on the site offering basic summaries of the plays and individual characters. It was an exercise in SEO (search engine optimization). To put it bluntly, if I built it, would they come? Yes, those pages are hit thousands of times each month. But that project was also a cobble-together job, very static and hard to maintain. I always knew I wanted to rewrite it.

Now I have. The specific technology I wanted to practice is known as React and TailwindCSS, for the curious (with some Vite thrown in). Instead of having hundreds of static pages, only a few dynamically generated ones power all of the content. This allows me to create a better user experience that I can easily maintain. When I update the content, I need to push a single file. When I want to touch up the visual design, I can do it consistently across all the pages.

Start With The Plays
Start With The Characters

How You Can Help

  • If you find any broken links, please let me know; since this is a small React app running side-by-side with WordPress, I had to do some fancy rewriting trickery behind the scenes, and it may not always be perfect.
  • I admit that this was built using gen AI, and we know AI tends to hallucinate. I’ve been steadily going through the more egregious issues and fixing the content by hand, but there are hundreds of entries to look at, so the more eyeballs we can put on the problem, the better. These hallucinations sometimes include making up characters that may not even exist. Be warned.
  • Quality Control Play titles should appear different than character names — Hamlet vs Hamlet, for example. HTML or other formatting that doesn’t look quite right. Fair warning I’m no visual designer, I just don’t have the eye for it. If you’ve got ideas for making it look more beautiful, too, starting with color, maybe? I’m happy to take them.
  • New Features What can we add to this? It originally started as a full browser of the entire play text (which still exists in the static pages), but moving that whole thing to React is a much bigger job I’m continuing to work on behind the scenes. What else? How can we make these pages the most useful for all those Google users finding their way to them?
  • Hire Me? This part’s obligatory — if you know any place hiring full-stack developers, particularly those experienced in Ruby on Rails (and now React and TailwindCSS!), please, by all means, send my name along. Beggars can’t be choosers in this market. I’ll take every lead that comes my way.

Thanks For Everything

Like so many of my projects, this is a work in progress, so please don’t be too hard on the effort. I’ve got so many irons in the fire these days that it’s hard to keep my attention focused long enough to stick to a single project as long as I want. I should probably also be doing things in Python, Go and Rails, too. I appreciate having this platform to work on what I can when I can and the continued help and support of all my readers. Thank you.

Review: Denzel Washington as Macbeth

~ duane ~ 1 Comment

I suppose the official title of this production is “The Tragedy of Macbeth”, directed by Joel Coen and starring Denzel Washington and Frances McDormand in the title roles, but that’s too much to fit in a title. You all no doubt know which production I’m referring to. Though it came out in 2021, I’ve finally sat down to watch the entire thing.

If you are a student of the art of film-making, you’re probably going to love this. It’s one of those final products that is all about the director’s vision, regardless of what actors he had to work with or what source material they spoke. Every scene is clearly driven by, “Ok, I want it to look like this.”

For my part, I hate that. Shakespeare, to me, is all about the character. Why are the characters speaking to each other the way that they do? What’s their backstory, their motivation? Why are they making the choices that they make? I can get that on a bare stage with no costumes. I don’t need special effects.

Macbeth's Castle
Seriously, who was their architect? What if they did have kids? That’s so dangerous.

Worse, I think that the visual backflips in this version are disjointed and distracting. Like when Macbeth and Banquo have first encountered the witches (more on this in a moment) and get to the line “Whither are they vanished? Into thin air…” but they are still right there. Or when the murderers set Macduff’s castle fully ablaze in a matter of seconds, just so we can get the image of people falling into the flames. Don’t get me started on the MC Escher-esque castle that the Macbeths live in. It’s like they borrowed some scenery from David Bowie’s Labyrinth.

Starring Kathryn Hunter as The Witches

Let’s talk about the witch(es) for a moment because clearly, she/they are the best part of the production. I would see a one-person show of just this performance. Kathryn Hunter alone plays the witches. Is she playing one, then, or three? Or one body housing three spirits? Yes, I guess, to all the things. If she didn’t play it so well, I’d be taking serious issue with the inconsistency in the presentation. Sometimes, she’s just one person speaking in three (or more?) voices. Other times, she splits into three. Or, she’s one body casting three reflections or shadows. She’s also a bit of a contortionist, which only adds to the otherworldliness of the whole performance. When I first started watching this at home on my laptop, my son walked by and said, “What the hell is that? That’s terrifying.”

Kathryn Hunter as the Witches

I’d watch a one-person show of that because the other actors have no choice but to break the illusion. Why does Macbeth refer to “them” in the plural when there’s just one person there? Something like that leaps off the screen and pulls me out of the moment. It’s a minor thing, I suppose. It just feels disjointed, as I mentioned above. It is as if the director is saying, “Yes, I know what the script says, but I know what I want the visual to be, even if they don’t match!”

Bring It Home, Denzel

Even if the director didn’t care much about how the actors played their parts, they still had to find something to work with. Though I admit I wasn’t hanging on every word, I liked parts of Washington’s performance, such as Macbeth. His explanation of killing Duncan’s guards can be summed up as “Sometimes I get into this weird mood where I randomly kill people, I can’t explain it,” and it is the implied, “Would you like to be next?” that cranks up the tension. Everybody probably wonders precisely what happened, but they know they’d better not question it too deeply.

Toward the end, I also enjoyed the way he played his assumed immortality to a point. Everything’s falling apart around him; most of the witches’ prophecies have come true, yet he’s still almost laughing at it all, believing himself to be invincible. His speech to Young Siward is a cross between a serial killer and a Marvel supervillain. Unfortunately, this is ruined by a ridiculous fight scene, but I’ll take what I can get.

See It Or Skip It?

I’ll end how I started. If you’re a fan of the art of filmmaking, this is a great example. You can pause at any point and break down why the director wanted that scene to look like it does. It’s disorienting 100% of the time. There are claustrophobic shots, there are shots looking straight down. There’s nothing extra in any of the scenes, it often feels like bare stage. For me, though, I think that takes away from the Shakespeare. Shakespeare didn’t make any of those decisions, Joel Coen did. Which is fine if your plan is to go see the Coen version of Macbeth. But I’m more about the actors, I wanted to see more of Denzel Washington’s Macbeth. I got some. I liked some. I just wish it was more about the words and the actors and not the visuals.

Macbeth on his throne
Macbeth doing his best Thanos impression.

Wicked Shakespeare

~ duane ~ 1 Comment

Ok, show of hands, has everybody seen Wicked yet? How many times? 🙂

Well, it’s now available for streaming, which means we get to take screenshots. And with screenshots and subtitles, we get to do this!

You just knew that if there were any Shakespeare in there, we would find it. Here, of course, Galinda (or Glinda) borrows Malvolio’s quote from Twelfth Night: “Some are born great, some achieve greatness, and some have greatness thrust upon them.”

This got me thinking about something I like to call the “Lion King Rule.” That’s the one that says you only need a handful of recognizable elements of a Shakespeare play to say that a movie is based on that movie. So, is Wicked a retelling of any Shakespeare plays?

We’ve got a father who wants nothing to do with his wife’s new baby and demands it be taken away. There’s even a bear. This makes it Winter’s Tale.

We’ve also got a powerful solo central character who is positioned as a pawn of powerful political forces. When our hero fails to do what they’re told, they’re recast as the villain of the story. There’s also a “frenemy” character who our hero may or may not be in love with but will certainly be instrumental in their downfall. Coriolanus.

Of course, this is a story about witches. Therefore, it is obviously Macbeth.

Anything else?