Category: Shakespeare Plays
William Shakespeare is widely regarded as one of the most influential playwrights in history, and his plays have been performed and studied for centuries. From the timeless tragedy of Romeo and Juliet to the hilarious antics of A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Shakespeare’s plays continue to captivate audiences around the world. Whether you’re a fan of tragedy, comedy, or romance, there’s a Shakespeare play for everyone. So why not revisit these timeless classics and discover the magic of Shakespeare for yourself?
Browse the entire text of Shakespeare’s plays right here on Shakespeare Geek.
Macbeth V : Fleance Strikes Back
It’s time once again for your Shakespeare Geek to head into his children’s classroom and volunteer to expose them to the wonderful world of Shakespeare. I’ve been doing it for years, and it’s always quite the experience.
This year my daughter is turning 11, which puts her in 5th grade according to typical USA grading levels (I know sometimes saying grade 5 is really confusing to my international readers). In third grade we’d done Midsummer and in fourth grade we’d done selections from Hamlet and Romeo and Juliet. So this year it was Macbeth by request.
In the past I’ve taken a firm stance on not using “modern interpretation” because I think that you’re not giving the kids a chance to appreciate the original that way, you’re just somebody retelling the story. From experience I’ve taken a step back from that stance, however. This is not a stage production where I’ve got a multiple visits and rehearsals with these kids. I need to get them introduced to the topic and doing something with it in a single visit, typically 30-60 minutes. I could easily spend that much time doing a single scene of a single play, in original text. While most of the class sits watching, bored.
So instead I did something different. I banged out my own “kid’s Macbeth”. Half streamlined summary, half modern language, with some key classic bits left in because I wanted them to be able at the end of it to say that they’re performed Shakespeare and not just some random dad’s retelling of Shakespeare.
I get there and am quite pleased that they are expecting me, and looking forward to it. I check to see how many of the kids were with me for fourth grade or third grade, and it looks like more than half the kids have done Shakespeare with me in the past. So I dive right in and tell them about what we’ll be working on today – Shakespeare’s scariest story complete with murderers and ghosts and witches and beheadings, and I’m pleased to see a number of fist pumps at the prospect. I go on to tell them a little bit about King James and why Shakespeare wrote Macbeth. And of course I tell them about the curse. “Shakespeare wrote a play about witches that was so good, that he may have overshot his mark just a bit. This play is so realistic, and so scary, that people believe he actually conjured real demons who put a real life curse on the play.” Well, the kids just eat that up.
I also have a treat in store. I explain to them that they all already know at least some Macbeth. I nod to the teacher to cue up the video that I’ve brought. I ask who has ever heard of a book called Harry Potter. Hands shoot up. I ask who has seen the movie. I ask who has seen the third movie, Prisoner of Azkaban. They begin discussing among themselves which one that was. I say, “Watch this.”
*BOOM* I drop my massive copy of the First Folio on one kid’s desk (I love doing that), opened to the appropriate page, and read, “Fillet of a fenny snake, in the cauldron boil and bake. Double double toil and trouble, fire burn and cauldron bubble.” What you just heard? Shakespeare wrote that four hundred years ago.
One girl says to no one in particular, “I think I’ve heard that before.”
“I guarantee you’ve heard that before,” I tell them. “At one point in your lives, whether it was a tv show or a movie or a cartoon, if you’ve ever seen the image of witches around a cauldron making a magic potion, you’ve seen those lines. And you know what? Now you get to perform them.”
So we dive right in and I explain my version of what somebody once told me was the “whoosh” game. To avoid fighting over parts, what we’ll do is have a steady stream of kids come up at every Entrance. Enter as Macbeth? Fine. But once you exit, you get back in line, and next time you might be entering as a messenger or Banquo or a witch. Just go with it. I encourage them that if you’re a ghost, give me some serious ghost moves, make it scary Walking Dead zombie stuff. And if you’re a witch, even if you’re a boy, you make sure to bring your cackly witch voice. If you get to kill somebody make it a good one, and if you get to die, die a glorious death.
We also did something different with the script. I asked the teacher to project it on the wall, teleprompter style. I knew that this would be an issue with looking at the screen instead of each other, but I thought this would be better than having them constantly lose their place flipping through a paper script. (We actually compromised, since I got there and she had printed all the scripts — so the kids in their seats followed along on paper while the kids ‘on stage’ read from the screen.)
I won’t go over the entire thing but the opening scene offers a good example:
SCENE
I cue the seated students to provide the sounds of a battle, which they respond to so enthusiastically that the teacher has to tell them that there is standardized testing going on in the next room, keep it down.
Gambling on The Gambler (and losing :))
Normally I wouldn’t give a second thought to a Mark Wahlberg movie like The Gambler. It’s just not the kind of thing that interests me. But then I learned that he plays a Shakespeare professor with a gambling problem. Ok, that’s more interesting. Still, though, if that’s just character development then we’ve all seen it before – cut to a scene of him dismissing a classroom full of students and telling them there’s a quiz on Romeo and Juliet tomorrow. Bam, you’ve just established him as a Shakespeare professor.
Only…not this time. The clip I found actually opens with him talking about
Greene’s Groats-Worth of Wit, if you can believe it! There’s a reference that the typical “took Shakespeare in high school” audience is not going to get.
Even better! A student makes a joke that Greene’s “beautified with our feathers” line is actually because he knew that Shakespeare was really Edward de Vere.
First of all, what? I’m not even sure where the connection lies between those two thoughts.
But it gets better, because Wahlberg doesn’t have any patience with the anti-Stratfordian argument. “The Earl of Oxford wrote poetry,” he responds. “Badly.”
I have not finished the movie yet, so perhaps someone can tell me — is that it? Does Shakespeare, either his words or his themes, play a larger role in the movie? Having just completed The Humbling I’m left a bit disappointed. If somebody tells me that’s it for interesting Shakespeare content, I probably won’t finish this one.
Pacino as King Lear? Why else would I watch The Humbling?
I would never have heard of “The Humbling” if Google news alerts didn’t pop it up for a Shakespeare reference. It stars Al Pacino and is based on the Philip Roth novel, which I have not read.
The play opens with Pacino, dressed in a trenchcoat and looking like something out of Death of a Salesman, practicing the ages of man speech from As You Like It. It looks at first like he’s trying to remember his lines, but we soon see that he is trying to decide how he’s supposed to deliver them. The line between his acting and his reality is becoming a blur, and he’s having trouble differentiating between what he feels and what he’s only pretending to feel. After an event at the performance sends him to the hospital there’s a funny scene where he’s moaning in pain and asks the nurse, “Do you believe that? That I’m in pain?” When she says she does he says, “I could do that better. Let me try it again,” and tries a different delivery. It’s not that he’s faking. He just can’t escape analyzing his own performance, even when it is reality.
Now we get to what I like to call the “not Shakespeare” part of the movie. He goes to rehab and meets a crazy stalker lady who wants him to kill her husband because as an actor he’s got experience. Then he comes home and starts a relationship with the daughter of some old friends of his, who happens to be a lesbian. He’s then quickly introduced to the past loves of her life, including the department head who she slept with to get her job, and a post-op transgender man who still wants her.
Or maybe not. Scenes often play out, only to reset as if they’d never happened. It becomes obvious that Pacino’s character is losing his mind, and some if not all of the above may not have ever happened. Throughout the film he engages in regular videoconference updates with his therapist, who also has trouble distinguishing what’s actually happening from what Pacino thinks is happening.
Now, back to the Shakespeare. After vowing never to get on stage again, Pacino is ultimately pulled back for a performance of King Lear. I mean sure, why not, a guy has a nervous breakdown during As You Like It, goes to rehab, swears off acting, of course you want to just throw him right into Shakespeare’s Mount Everest. I’m ok with that, though, because it means we get to watch Al Pacino perform some of King Lear.
It’s an interesting movie, but it’s not a Shakespeare movie. It’s mostly Pacino, but in a way that I would have liked even more Pacino, if that makes sense? He’s surrounded by this crazy cast of characters that are all trying to take the focus away from his character and I found them more of an annoyance than anything else. It might be interesting if you’ve read the book, I suppose. Or if you’re a “see everything” Al Pacino fan. But other than that it didn’t do much for me.
The War is Coming. Oh, and I am Psychic.
Back in November 2011 I reviewed a graphic novel called Romeo and Juliet: The War. I remember that I quite liked it. It’s overly violent, and there’s a weirdly gratuitous nude scene that may have been inserted to appease the teenage boy demographic but completely ruled out the chance of me showing it to my kids, but overall I was happy with the effort. It looked very nice and stayed consistent with the world they’d built.
I even said:
You know what? I said that it looks like a movie. I think that if somebody tried to tell this version of the story as a movie, it could be pretty awesome.
Well, look what I found. Romeo and Juliet: The War is coming in 2017. It’s one of those “only accessible with IMDB Pro” deals so I can’t get all the scoop. Maybe one of the readers out there can see it? We definitely know it’s the same source material, though, because in the “People who liked this also liked…” section, I can see a Stan Lee movie :).
I’ll keep watching for more news about this one!